Background. In June 2003,
only three months before the deployment of the first UN
peacekeeping
mission in Liberia, the Secretary General – in his assessment report to the
Security Council
– made the following insightful observation:
“Liberia remains
the epicenter of the continuing endemic instability, which is gravely
affecting the
political, humanitarian and security landscape not only in the Mano River
Union subregion
but also throughout much of West Africa.”119
His comments,
coming at a time when the country was seemingly plunging once again into
civil war, help
draw the political map of a conflict which ravaged the Mano River countries120
– Liberia,
Sierra Leone, and Guinea – for more than a decade, starting with the early
1990s. In
a region characterized
by potentially explosive ethnic conflicts and shady political
maneuvering, the
complicated allegiances between politicians, rebel groups, military, and
unofficial
militias actively contributed to the creation of a pervasive culture of
impunity and
massive human
rights violations. Unofficial ties between presidential hopefuls, such as
General Gueï of
Côte d’Ivoire – the mastermind of the 1999 Ivorian coup d’état – and the
Liberian Charles
Taylor, head of the National Patriotic Front of Liberia (NPFL) rebel group, reveal
the workings of regional networks of power which helped maintain a climate of
political
instability121. In this
context, as the Secretary General pointed out in March 2005,
“durable peace”
within the region – Côte d’Ivoire, Liberia, and Sierra Leone — could only be
achieved if “a
number of key issues [are] addressed at both the national and the subregional
level” 122. These key
issues referred to the tackling of what the Secretary General identified as
the “the root
causes” of instability: the active recruitment of ex-combatants, the lack of
coordination in
disarmament and demobilization programs, failure to prevent human rights
violations,
non-compliance with the ceasefire agreement etc. By emphasizing the need for a
new, integrated
type of approach in dealing with local warfare, the Secretary General also
signalled that
the international community was finally talking a proactive stance in Liberia,
whose civilian
population had experienced two civil wars, massive displacement, and human
rights abuses123.
The roots of the
Liberian crisis can be traced as far back as 1980, when Master Sergeant
Samuel Doe’s
military coup brutally ousted from power President William Tolbert Jr. and laid
the seeds for
the country’s first civil war (1989 - 1997). The subsequent period of violent
clashes between
insurgents – among which a prominent faction was Charles Taylor’s National
Patriotic Front
of Liberia (NPFL) – and governmental forces officially ended with the signing
of the Abuja
Agreement on August 19, 1995, brokered by ECOWAS. Despite several
ceasefire
violations and armed attacks, the July 1997 presidential elections – declared
free and
fair by
international observers – legitimized the de facto leadership of Charles Taylor
and
succeeded in
re-stabilizing the country. Peace was however short-lived, and by April 1999
hostilities were
re-opened with a new, reconfigured set of political actors: LURD, (Liberians
United for
Reconciliation and Democracy) representing the largest anti-Taylor rebel
faction
and having
Guinea as a likely sponsor124, the so-called
MODEL or the Movement for
Democracy in
Liberia, potentially backed by Côte d’Ivoire’s Laurent Gbagbo125, and the
president’s
security forces, split between various independent and competing units126. By May
2003 however,
when it had become clear that the NPFL was losing the war, international
mediation
succeeded in bringing the parties back to the negotiation table. The result was
the
Comprehensive
Peace Agreement signed by all major stakeholders in Accra, Ghana on August 18.
President Taylor handed over power to Vice-President Moses Blah and left
Liberia for a
comfortable exile in Nigeria. A National Transitional Government was agreed
upon, and
provisions were made for the organization of presidential elections in October
2005, which took
place according to the initial schedule and resulted in the election of
Liberia’s first
woman President: Ellen Johnson Sirleaf.
Despite
maintaining a rather low profile in the Liberian crisis – mostly handled
internationally
by ECOWAS, which
had established an observer mission in Monrovia, ECOMOG (The
Military
Observer Group), as early as 1990 – the UN involvement in the country’s civil
wars
had been quite
constant, although not necessarily effective in terms of civilian protection.
The two
consecutive UN missions – UNOMIL (the United Nations Observer Mission in
Liberia)
authorized by Security Council Resolution 866 of September 22, 1993 and UNOL
(The United
Nations Peace-building Support Office in Liberia) established by the Secretary
General on
November 1, 1997 – had largely played an advisory role, helping either the
ECOWAS mission,
or the Liberian Government in implementing peace agreements and
providing
logistic support for the 1997 election (UNOMIL) and for the further
consolidation
of the peace
process (UNOL). Although the Security Council had been aware of massive
human rights
abuses prior to and after the election of Charles Taylor, it decided – at least
until
the 1999
outbreak of violence – not to upgrade its missions to the level of peacekeeping
operations.
However, the UN position changed considerably after the signing of the Accra
Comprehensive
Peace Agreement. The parties invited the Council to deploy a peacekeeping
force in Liberia
“to support the National Transitional Government and assist in the
implementation
of the Peace Agreement”127
and
to ensure, in general, the stability of the
country’s
democratically elected regime.
UNMIL (2003 –
2005). Answering
these international requests for a stronger UN presence in
Liberia, the
Security Council issued Resolution 1497 of August 1, 2003, authorizing the
deployment of an
ECOWAS mission – ECOMIL – as the first step in a peacekeeping
operation which
would ultimately establish a longer-term UN stabilization force. The
ECOMIL
multinational unit – the result of an extraordinary ECOWAS summit at Accra on
July 31, 2003 –
was mandated among others to support the implementation of the ceasefire
agreement and to
ensure a level of security that would enable the delivery of humanitarian
assistance. The
issues of civilian protection and human rights violations figured high on the
Security Council’s agenda, an outcome perhaps of UN’s previous failure to
effectively
address these
problems during Liberia’s two decades of political instability.
In his
preliminary September 2003 report, while presenting his recommendations
regarding
the size,
structure, and mandate of a follow-up UN mission, the Secretary General
estimated
that as a
consequence of ongoing fighting and regime brutality nearly 1,000,000 people –
from a
population of approximately 2,5 million – had been displaced, either internally
or as
refugees in
neighbouring countries such as Sierra Leone and Côte d’Ivoire. Moreover, the
report mentioned
that since 1989 from an estimated number of 250,000 war victims
approximately
half of them had been non-combatants128. According to the Secretary General,
eyewitness
accounts as well as reports of mass graves – some of them dating back to 1990 –
were just as
many proofs testifying about the level of violence which the country had
experienced,
with all factions equally accused of having reverted to torture, mutilations,
sexual violence,
killings, and the use of child soldiers. The militarization of Liberian society
and the
proliferation of militia groups lacking any “statutory command and control
structure”129 had triggered,
argued the Secretary General, the creation of “culture of
violence”130 which could only
be eliminated by concerted UN actions131.
In the light of
these recommendations and based on the findings of the UN multidisciplinary
assessment
mission led by the Secretary General’s Special Representative Jacques Paul
Klein,
the Security
Council passed resolution 1509 of September 19, 2003 authorizing the
deployment of
the United Nations Mission in Liberia (UNMIL). Its mandate focused on five
important tasks:
(1) the implementation of the ceasefire; (2) the protection of United Nations
staff,
facilities, and civilians; (3) support for humanitarian and human rights
assistance; (4)
support for
security reform; and (5) support for the implementation of the peace process.
Overall, UNMIL
was assigned to start the much needed DDRR program (disarmament,
demobilization,
rehabilitation, and reintegration), to ensure the security of both locals and
humanitarian
workers, and – on a more general level – to help pacifying the country ahead of
the scheduled
October 2005 elections. The mission – which was to be deployed throughout
Liberia in four
major sectors with the headquarters in Monrovia132 – consisted of up to 15,000
authorized
military personnel, including approximately 250 military observers and 160
staff
officers as well
as a maximum of 1,115 civilian police officers. On October 1, 2003 the
ECOMIL forces
underwent a “re-hatting” procedure as UN personnel, thus signaling the complete
takeover of its peacekeeping functions by the newly established UNMIL, under
the
command of
Special Representative Klein. The deployment of troops occurred in several
stages, with
soldiers being gradually relocated from Monrovia to all the above-mentioned
sectors. Despite
continuing violent clashes between rebels, peacekeepers, and governmental
forces, the
Secretary General’s first progress report emphasized the “considerable progress
achieved in
consolidating stability in Monrovia and its surroundings”133. By March 2004,
after the
deployment of additional troops, the Secretary General maintained that although
human rights
violations were still reported throughout Liberia “most of the abuses and
violations had
taken place in isolated areas where peacekeepers ha[d] not been deployed”134.
The positive
trend in reducing criminality and countering violent looting perpetrated by
former
combatants is obvious in his subsequent reports to the Security Council.
Moreover, the
changing nature
of these attacks – usually conducted by disaffected former combatants or
LURD splinter
factions – suggested that the conflict’s scale was reduce from formerly
wellorganized
and
destabilizing forms of protest to “minor crimes” and “civil unrest”135. As an
example of the
mission’s strength, both in terms of its military and civilian components, in
his
December 2004
report the Secretary General praised the swift UNMIL reaction to a series of
incidents which
had occurred between 28 and 31 October, when an initial land dispute had
quickly
escalated into severe rioting and burning of private property. Although
initially
deploying only
its civilian police, in the face of mounting street pressure UNMIL “undertook
robust action to
bring the situation under control and forestall further acts of violence in the
affected areas”136.“Robust action”
meant fast redeployment of one infantry and two additional
police units to
Monrovia, patrols in the dangerous sections of the city conducted by the
UNMIL Quick Reaction
Force, aerial reconnaissance and show-of-force patrols over the city,
the sealing of
Monrovia’s main entry points (or roads), and cordon-and-search operations.
Military actions
were enforced by radio appeals to calm coming from Special representative
Jacques Paul
Klein, officials of the National Transitional Government, and members of the
Inter-Religious
Council of Liberia. A light curfew was also imposed by the Chairman of the
National
Transition Government, Gyude Bryant. The result was the quick restoration of
order
with minimum
casualties137. The successful
coordination of actions between various UNMIL
units and
Liberian officials proved that provocative attacks by ex-combatants and active
rebel
factions could
be effectively controlled. In terms of civilian protection achievements, the
improved security conditions ensured that the UNMIL human rights unit could
focus on
monitoring and
registering abuses as well as in actively advising the government on the
implementation
of adequate legislation138. In February
2006, the independent expert on the
situation of
human rights in Liberia, Charlotte Abaka, submitted a comprehensive report on
the issue and
mentioned that “improvements in the security situation have enhanced freedom
of movement and
facilitated the conduct of national elections”139. Although, as the Secretary
General pointed
out in his last report on Liberia, in December 2005, the situation was “calm,
but fragile”140, substantial
progress had been made in re-establishing the rule of law. Recently,
the Security
Council – indirectly acknowledging these positive developments – has decided to
redeploy UNMIL
personnel for the protection of the Special Court for Sierra Leone141 and a
maximum of one
infantry company for UNOCI142, the United
Nations’ Operation in Côte
d’Ivoire.
In summary. Overall,
taking into consideration the two indicators of effectiveness we have so
far analyzed, it
has become clear from the analytical reading of the case study that UNMIL
has fulfilled
its mandated task. Given the efficiency of its measures for the restoration of
order
(indicator 2)
and the protection of civilians within its areas of deployment as well as the
control
(indicator 1) exercised by UN troops over Liberia’s territory, our assessment
of the
case is
positive: UNMIL has been effective in protecting civilians. After applying the
analytic framework to our analysis of Liberia’s UN intervention a couple
of interesting
results have emerged. First, the Liberian case can be considered a success
story,
also in view of the
country’s October 2005 elections when, after what international observers
had declared a
free and fair process - a woman, Ellen Johnson Sirleaf, was elected head of
state. The
improving security situation in Liberia and the ever growing participation of
its
civil society in
ongoing deliberations about the country’s reconstruction process is a telling
proof that UNMIL
has been effective in protecting civilians. Second, almost all the factors
under analysis
have been assigned positive values. The UN mission is thus characterized by
an adequate
size, sufficient equipment, high commitment, and credibility. Its human rights
component
(“Expert Knowledge”) is actively engaged in promoting human rights culture and
legislation. The
UN troops are homogeneous – as defined in Section 5.1. – and the salience of
the “protection
of civilians” task within the mission’s mandate is high. Moreover, with respect
to potential
conflicts, the situation is stable, although as yet fragile. The DDR program
has
successfully
demobilized ex-combatants and large quantities of weapons have been
confiscated.
Despite ongoing looting, especially in more remote areas of the country, and
persistent,
though small scale street clashes, the intensity of the conflict is low. The UN
is
perceived as the
legitimate actor in the implementation of the peace process (high
“Legitimacy”)
and the reconstruction of Liberia’s democratic institutions. Cooperation from
major political
figures, though tentative at first, has positively evolved over the last year.
In
conclusion, we
can safely say that UNMIL is actively fulfilling its peacekeeping mandate (not
“enforcement
mandate” though) and that the protection of civilians has figured high on the
agenda from the
first moment of the mission’s deployment. The protection of civilians, if
necessary with the help of military force, is a
relatively new
task in the ever-increasing repertoire of functions which UN peacekeeping
missions have
come to assume, especially since the end of the Cold War. At the same time,
for civilians
caught in the devastating dynamics of the “new wars”, physical protection is
doubtlessly the
most important and immediate concern. The novelty and salience of the
protection of civilians
by international forces justify the highest level of academic attention.
Bibliography
Documents
“Ceasefire
Agreement” [between the Republic of Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo,
the Republic of
Namibia, the Republic of Rwanda, the Republic of Uganda and the
Republic of
Zimbabwe; a.k.a. “Lusaka Ceasefire Agreement”], Lusaka, 10 July 1999,
S/1999/815,
Annex.
“Peace Agreement
Between the Government of Sierra Leone and the Revolutionary United
Front of Sierra
Leone”, Lomé, 03 June 1999.
United Nations
Security Council (1992): Resolution 761, S/RES/761, 29 June 1992 (“Bosnia-
Herzegovina”).
United Nations
Security Council (1992): Resolution 794, S/RES/794, 03 December 1992
(“Somalia”).
United Nations
Security Council (1994): Resolution 918, S/RES/918, 17 May 1994
(“Rwanda”).
U
Books and
Articles
Bothe, Michael (2002):
Peacekeeping, in: Simma, Bruno (ed.): The Charter of the United
Nations. A
Commentary, Munich, pp. 648-700.
Bullion, Alan
(2001): India in Sierra Leone: A Case of Muscular Peacekeeping?, in:
International
Peacekeeping 8 (4), 77-91.
Debiel, Tobias (2003):
UN-Friedensoperationen in Afrika. Weltinnenpolitik und die Realität
von
Bürgerkriegen, Bonn. Reno, William (2001): The Failure of
Peacekeeping in Sierra Leone, in: Current History,
May, 219-225.
Ulriksen, Stale,
Catriona Gourlay und Catriona Mace (2004): Operation Artemis: The Shape
of Things to Come?, in:
International Peacekeeping 11 (3), 508-525
Reports
Amnesty
International (2000): Sierra Leone: United Nations Security Council Must Ensure
the Protection
of Civilians, 18 May 2000,
http://web.amnesty.org/library/Index/engAFR510152000
(accessed 10 March 2006). Human Rights Watch (2002): Back to the
Brink. War Crimes by Liberian Government and
Rebels. Vol.14: 4 (A).
Newspaper
Articles and Other Sources
Bafalikike,
Lokongo (2002): What Is MONUC Doing Here?, in: New African 409,
July/August.
Bush, George
H.W. (1991): Address Before a Joint Session of the Congress on the Cessation
of the Persian
Gulf Conflict, 06 March 1991,
http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/index.php?pid=19364&st=&st1=
(accessed 10
March 2006).
Masland, Tom and
Jeffrey Bartholet (2000a): The Thin Blue Line, in: Newsweek, 15 May
2000.
No comments:
Post a Comment